[8827Echo]

Let me define cheat for you Manny:

Gain an unfair advantage by deception or breaking rules, esp. in a game of examination. A trick, fraud, deception.

Does 1 person's happiness during cheating, justify those that have not cheated and are legit? I read (at gamespy I think) an interview of a cheater who makes cheats for CS. He was asked why he cheated, and said he was bored at the game, and wanted to liven in up (or something similiar to that). So if he is bored, what right does he have to ruin the fun of millions of other people?

My definition of Online Cheating.
Cheats spread like a disease, a plague. There is no definent cure for it. There are those, like scientists, always working to find a cure to stop this madness. But alas, cheats, like influenza, comes in different shapes and sizes. Once one type is destroyed, another, in another form, or altered from before, wreaks havoc once again. Contageous, for some, those who do not cheat, angered and fustrated by cheats, are forced to cheat themselves just to catch up. But there are those immune to it, who withstand it, who do anything in their power to stop it from spreading. And in the end, the hard way (not cheating) is the right way. Cheats will be caughts, there will be a day where this profanity of online gaming will be destroyed. (Ok so mine was crap. )