USA VS. EUROPE - WHO WINS? (Disregarding nukes) - Page 13

chipsdw · 06-09-2003, 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Innoxx

Europe. Greenland is part of Denmark; Denmark is in Europe.

i beg to differ! Greenland is part of North America. just because one peice of land is owned by a country in one place doesnt mean its all in the same continent. example: Russia.

and europe would not work to well together... so it is kinda like wrestle mania... one by one

06-09-2003, 07:46 PM

[quote="White Rabbit":ef0e2][quote="Maple SyRuP":ef0e2]lol people actully think usa would win?!
ROFL!!!!![/quote:ef0e2]

most people think the US will be in a defensive position thats why[/quote:ef0e2]

well why would we want to invade Europe anyway, their Hotels don't even have bathrooms in each room, remember National Lampoons European Vacation biggrin:

Unknown_Sniper · 06-09-2003, 07:59 PM

Yeah I think the countries in the European Union would break up with those not in it. Then it would be the richer countries, and the small militiant countries again the USA. We here in the USa do not like being on the Defence so we would bomb the hell out of france. Europe just lost alot of its coast line in that move. Next we take out england. Bomb London until it is a massive pile of rubble. The nmove onto the Dutch. Damn them. Then the germans. NExt the spanish. Then the....Polish, then the sweeds and the swiss. From there it would just get easier.

Unknown_Sniper · 06-09-2003, 08:04 PM

Yeah I think the countries in the European Union would break up with those not in it. Then it would be the richer countries, and the small militiant countries again the USA. We here in the USa do not like being on the Defence so we would bomb the hell out of france. Europe just lost alot of its coast line in that move. Next we take out england. Bomb London until it is a massive pile of rubble. The nmove onto the Dutch. Damn them. Then the germans. NExt the spanish. Then the....Polish, then the sweeds and the swiss. From there it would just get easier.

imported_Fluffy_Bunny · 06-09-2003, 08:27 PM

With regards to USA & Brit/Canada?Australia vs China, just look at how NATO got its ass owned in the Korean war.

BTW Mr Chicago you still haven't answered my Rocketeer quote, and as for calling me jackass might I be so bold as to state; who is the most famous gangster of all time? OH YES, AL CAPONE and wheres he from? OH YES...

SHI-KA-GO

Maplegyver · 06-09-2003, 08:37 PM

but bu but btu the usa has many good allies in euorpe soupporting them in iraq and many other wars

06-09-2003, 09:11 PM

[quote:ce6e4]Sure the US of A is the highest funded military in the world, but not as much as all of Europe combined. Of course if this conflict were ever to happen, it would be WW3... or maybe even WW4. It would be a bloody conflict that would probably last for years but in the end, I think America would lose. One country vs a whole fucking continent? Please[/quote:ce6e4]

germany was one country and a lot smaller and they did a damn good job.

White Rabbit · 06-09-2003, 09:56 PM

[quote="Fluffy_Bunny":b8c2a]With regards to USA & Brit/Canada?Australia vs China, just look at how NATO got its ass owned in the Korean war.

SHI-KA-GO[/quote:b8c2a]

NATO got owned? oOo:

Simo Häyhä · 06-09-2003, 09:57 PM

korea was a draw

Stinger_Dude · 06-09-2003, 10:14 PM

[quote="Unknown_Sniper":c77d4]Yeah I think the countries in the European Union would break up with those not in it. Then it would be the richer countries, and the small militiant countries again the USA. We here in the USa do not like being on the Defence so we would bomb the hell out of france. Europe just lost alot of its coast line in that move. Next we take out england. Bomb London until it is a massive pile of rubble. The nmove onto the Dutch. Damn them. Then the germans. NExt the spanish. Then the....Polish, then the sweeds and the swiss. From there it would just get easier.[/quote:c77d4]

Its easier said that done. Remeber Blitzkrieg. Well this very evil man called Adolf Hitler, he was a very evil man he did many bad thigns to ppl. Anyways he took over France and decided to turn England into a rubble. But his evil scheme didnt work and he lost his war. mmmmkkkkkaaayyy?

Chango · 06-09-2003, 10:22 PM

[quote="Stinger_Dude":e2803]Its easier said that done. Remeber Blitzkrieg. Well this very evil man called Adolf Hitler, he was a very evil man he did many bad thigns to ppl. Anyways he took over France and decided to turn England into a rubble. But his evil scheme didnt work and he lost his war. mmmmkkkkkaaayyy?[/quote:e2803]

he focused most of his troops on Russia right after he took over France, if he had left Russia alone his evil scheme would've worked. Its because he attacked Russia instead of finishing England he lost, not because England overwhelmed him.

Stinger_Dude · 06-09-2003, 10:29 PM

[quote=Chango]

Quote:

Originally Posted by "Stinger_Dude":b3ed6

Its easier said that done. Remeber Blitzkrieg. Well this very evil man called Adolf Hitler, he was a very evil man he did many bad thigns to ppl. Anyways he took over France and decided to turn England into a rubble. But his evil scheme didnt work and he lost his war. mmmmkkkkkaaayyy?

he focused most of his troops on Russia right after he took over France, if he had left Russia alone his evil scheme would've worked. Its because he attacked Russia instead of finishing England he lost, not because England overwhelmed him.[/quote:b3ed6]

yes I know. That would be the same for the US. They cant concentrate simply all their resources on one country one by one. They need to split up and therefore it would already be a difficult task if they spilt up.

Ydiss · 06-10-2003, 03:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chipsdw

and europe would not work to well together... so it is kinda like wrestle mania... one by one

Of course it is.

Man, with your knowledge why don't you work for the government?

"Mr President, we have a situation... Europe is planning a mass combined invasion on America!"

"Gee wiz, son! Best bring the Ultimate Warrior out of retirement! He'll whoop ass, baby!"

"But, Mr President..."

"No, I won't hear it! I think we'll take out that funny little place first.. Great Britain, isn't it? Ok, ask Britain if they'll go first, then we can let Germany and France attack. Those French aren't up to much, they don't even shave their under-arms!"

"Sir, they're hardly going to..."

"That's enough from you, boy! Hell, why don't you go and start setting up the queue lanes, make sure to get plenty of "If you're not this tall..." signs for those short-asses... We don't want them attacking us until the end."

I'm sorry, but if Europe had to join forces to invade any country each and every faction within the EU has its own able strategies. Even if they refused to work alongside eachother (and, er, by coming to the conclusion to attack the most powerful nation on the planet, I think somehow that they would already have "worked well together") then they could still individually attack America and still over-whelm them by numbers.

But, your idea that they would take it in turns to attack is ludicrous. You've watched too many Rambo movies.

Remember this: There are what... 250 million people in America? By the time the war got as far as drafting in civilians America would be down to drafting women, children and old age pensioners when Europe would still have millions and millions of able-bodied young men ready for basic training.

And if anyone here believes a war between America and Russia, Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Turkey, Belgium, Norway, Sweden, Iceland, Spain, Austria, Luxembourg, Denmark, Netherlands, Portugal, Ireland, Liechtenstein, Cyprus, San Marino and Switzerland without it going as far as drafting in civilians has definitely watched too many Rambo movies.

Your idea that Europe would take it in turns to attack, or would not defend as a unit is a prime example of the foolish, self-important isolationistic attitude that Americans are infamous for.

Of course Europe wouldn't work together... Those Europeans are a lesser species, aren't they? They couldn't work their way out of a paper bag without the help of us Americans...

Tiwaz · 06-10-2003, 06:41 AM

Disregarding nukes. Okay.

What about bioweapons?

There's a good reason for this war. Europe will invade the US because they have a lot of (bio)weapons of mass destruction. And that is bad. Europe doesn't agree with the US' voting system either. Let's go there and sort things out. Stop talking, start fighting. Let's teach those rebel Europeans a lesson, it only has gotten worse since 1774, biggrin:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ydiss

Of course Europe wouldn't work together... Those Europeans are a lesser species, aren't they? They couldn't work their way out of a paper bag without the help of us Americans...

I like this one Ydiss, biggrin:

Ferich · 06-10-2003, 06:44 AM

1776?

Well, you have my vote for the most sarcastic and hypocritical reason as to why Europe would invade the United States.