Offtopic Any topics not related to the games we cover. Doesn't mean this is a Spam-fest. Profanity is allowed, enter at your own risk. |
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 598
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cave #23, Afghanistan
|

08-21-2003, 10:23 AM
If I remember correctly - YOU banned them, and made sure it was ok after the fact. Having said that your post SPECIFICALLY said that they were PM'd BEFORE the banning. Now you say they were PM'd a warning after being banned (real effective that), and THEN you're telling us that they did in fact respond to you - after the fact.
Oh ok.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 12,585
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Staten Island, NY, USA
|

08-21-2003, 10:36 AM
[quote="ED!":6d497]If I remember correctly - YOU banned them, and made sure it was ok after the fact. Having said that your post SPECIFICALLY said that they were PM'd BEFORE the banning. Now you say they were PM'd a warning after being banned (real effective that), and THEN you're telling us that they did in fact respond to you - after the fact.
Oh ok.[/quote:6d497]
Hrm. . .lets try this again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by "Bazooka_Joe
Yes, I sent them a warning message AFTER I banned them, lol
Acutally, I sent a PM to all three, Judas never responded, Tripper responded telling me to go fauk myself, and Simo I think just laughed.
|
I can type it bigger, if needed. Or maybe in red?
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 131
Join Date: Aug 2003
|

08-21-2003, 10:37 AM
[quote="Bazooka_Joe":a977f][quote="ED!":a977f]If I remember correctly - YOU banned them, and made sure it was ok after the fact. Having said that your post SPECIFICALLY said that they were PM'd BEFORE the banning. Now you say they were PM'd a warning after being banned (real effective that), and THEN you're telling us that they did in fact respond to you - after the fact.
Oh ok.[/quote:a977f]
Hrm. . .lets try this again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by "Bazooka_Joe
Yes, I sent them a warning message AFTER I banned them, lol
Acutally, I sent a PM to all three, Judas never responded, Tripper responded telling me to go fauk myself, and Simo I think just laughed.[/quote:a977f]
I can type it bigger, if needed. Or maybe in red?
|
Thats a well coded quote if ever i seen one. oOo:
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 12,585
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Staten Island, NY, USA
|

08-21-2003, 10:41 AM
Gerard, you see what I mean? And you wonder what how the site became the way it did today; with dumb replies like that just to get the last word in. Just drop it already, all of us! I'm done responding to Ed.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 598
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cave #23, Afghanistan
|

08-21-2003, 10:43 AM
Naw - if it made any SENSE, then there wouldnt be no problem. As it is - it dont make sense. You ban them, send them a pm, they respond and THAT's good enough reason for them to be banned. Or wait - JUDAS doesn't respond but hes still banned for all that useless spam he posted as Taco. Noone buys it joe - we all had access to shit you thought wouldnt come out. And there it is Mr New Yahk. Type some more in caps in bold - give pomp and circumstance to words that amount to nothing. The song remains the same kid. You fux0red up. Be a man and admit it.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
2nd Lieutenant
Posts: 3,441
Join Date: Oct 2002
|

08-21-2003, 10:46 AM
Get over it
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Administrator
Posts: 17,739
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Camp Crystal Lake
|

08-21-2003, 10:49 AM
^ What he said.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 204
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Kalifornia
|

08-21-2003, 10:50 AM
^ Agreed
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 598
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cave #23, Afghanistan
|

08-21-2003, 10:51 AM
I'd say the same to you guys but - it's uh different right. . . oOo:
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Colonel
Posts: 8,177
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ontario, New York
|

08-21-2003, 12:51 PM
joe you banned me, white rabbit, tripper, and judas for no good reason, just admit it because your bullshit is getting ridiculous
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 12,585
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Staten Island, NY, USA
|

08-21-2003, 01:11 PM
[quote="Simo Häyhä":ea0b2]joe you banned me, white rabbit, tripper, and judas for no good reason, just admit it because your bullshit is getting ridiculous[/quote:ea0b2]
You were banned because you were acting like an ass, as I explained to you in a PM. White Rabbit was banned simply because you two share an IP.
Tripper and Judas were banned along the same lines, but Judas was mainly banned for multiple member names. None-the-less, you're all unbanned as of 2 months ago, welcome back, move on.
*locked*
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 2,377
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Nottingham, England
|

08-21-2003, 06:00 PM
[quote="Bazooka_Joe":ca5f7]
*locked*[/quote:ca5f7]
Lol. Even now he tries to "verbally lock" a thread.
Sillyness.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Colonel
Posts: 8,177
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ontario, New York
|

08-21-2003, 06:03 PM
[quote="Bazooka_Joe":f1d5f][quote="Simo Häyhä":f1d5f]joe you banned me, white rabbit, tripper, and judas for no good reason, just admit it because your bullshit is getting ridiculous[/quote:f1d5f]
You were banned because you were acting like an ass, as I explained to you in a PM. White Rabbit was banned simply because you two share an IP.
Tripper and Judas were banned along the same lines, but Judas was mainly banned for multiple member names. None-the-less, you're all unbanned as of 2 months ago, welcome back, move on.
*locked*[/quote:f1d5f]
you never sent us a fucking PM you dumbshit. i read and save all my fucking PMs.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 2,294
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: South Side Chicago *GO SOX | BEARS | ILLINI*
|

08-21-2003, 06:12 PM
*sigh* he said she said. some ppl need to move on. 2 months ago? eek:
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 2,377
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Nottingham, England
|

08-21-2003, 06:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBird
*sigh* he said she said. some ppl need to move on. 2 months ago? eek:
|
I think the point here is that Bazooka cried rape when the forums were taken over. Words have since been exchanged saying those who agreed with it generally did bad.
The flip-side to that is that those who did get mod status saw his post regarding the bans and his excuse for doing it.
He was asked, quite clearly, why he did it (I don't remember anyone saying that he had cleared it with anyone first). His reply was that he had warned them all.
Of course, they all saw this and flipped. I dunno, I'm more inclined to believe 4 people over 1.
And the matter of the fact remains that during BJs time as mod there was far too many locked threads.
You could never reply to a thread because they all seemed to be locked.
On many occasions I would spend ages typing a reply only to be told the thread was locked when I tried to post it.
Annoying.
So, I think that it is understandable that he is being questioned about his actions, despite the fact that nothing can be proved.
From what I read on the MODS forum it looked pretty suspicious to me. Chances are BJ will be given admin status again shortly, and when that happens I would like to know that I am not going to be banned without warning simply because I annoyed 3-4 people enough that they complained to him.
|
|
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.
|