Why do people loathe George W Bush?

ToeNail · **Why do people loathe George W Bush? -** 09-13-2003, 08:51 AM

I am definately am not into politics and never will. I'd care less if we nuke Iraq for revenge. But I would like to know what the big reason for hating bush is. When I ask people, "Do you hate George Bush". I answer, why? They freeze and don't answer or they make up an unlogical reply. I think people some poeple hate bush just because a majority of other people say they hate bush. I personally do not favor him or hate him. Like I said I am not into politics.

Blitz-krieg · 09-13-2003, 09:35 AM

Lol, only peace activists and anti-war ppl hate George Bush

Ydiss · 09-13-2003, 09:49 AM

[quote="Blitz-krieg":a9819]Lol, only peace activists and anti-war ppl hate George Bush[/quote:a9819] You couldn't be further from the truth. It's not always that people hate him, either. Most ridicule him instead.

Why?

Not my place to say.

09-13-2003, 10:20 AM

I don't hate him, I just don't trust him.

Why, because I like freedom and I don't appreciate the Feds being able to see what books I read or listen in on a phone conversation without a warrant.

I also think he (or people working for him, who's ideas he just approved) has a lot of silly ideas, an already overly discussed "No Child Left Behind Act" which sounds like a good idea IN THEORY, but in reality it's a prime example of Federal inefficiency. (remember communism was supposed to work IN THEORY also, but IN REALITY IT FAILED, MISERABLY)

I really don't like the fact that he's all buddy-buddy with the Saudis when there's a strong suspicion that they fund terrorism.

Low spark · 09-13-2003, 12:42 PM

Envroinment.
Economy.
Education.
Foreign Relations.
Lack of vision for the future.

Paintballr · 09-13-2003, 11:04 PM

[quote="Sgt Stryker":bdda0]I don't hate him, I just don't trust him.

Why, because I like freedom and I don't appreciate the Feds being able to see what books I read or listen in on a phone conversation without a warrant.

I also think he (or people working for him, who's ideas he just approved) has a lot of silly ideas, an already overly discussed "No Child Left Behind Act" which sounds like a good idea IN THEORY, but in reality it's a prime example of Federal inefficiency. (remember communism was supposed to work IN THEORY also, but IN REALITY IT FAILED, MISERABLY)

I really don't like the fact that he's all buddy-buddy with the Saudis when there's a strong suspicion that they fund terrorism.[/quote:bdda0]

No child left behind i dont know but if that was that School thing they had it aint workin i got to a highschool that hasnt had anything been rebuilt for 51 years, we use books from 1992, and the school is under supplied we have like hardly anything teachers last year ran out of paper in 2 months. But i may be wrong with that child thing but i know he passed some thing with School involving with him.

Short Hand · 09-13-2003, 11:13 PM

i like his cut MY Taxes policy but i have a lil bit of a problem with his declare war on whoever gets in my way policy. ahh what the hell ill vote for ya bush.

09-13-2003, 11:25 PM

[quote=Paintballr]

Quote:

Originally Posted by "Sgt Stryker":8b0a7

I don't hate him, I just don't trust him.

Why, because I like freedom and I don't appreciate the Feds being able to see what books I read or listen in on a phone conversation without a warrant.

I also think he (or people working for him, who's ideas he just approved) has a lot of silly ideas, an already overly discussed "No Child Left Behind Act" which sounds like a good idea IN THEORY, but in reality it's a prime example of Federal inefficiency. (remember communism was supposed to work IN THEORY also, but IN REALITY IT FAILED, MISERABLY)

I really don't like the fact that he's all buddy-buddy with the Saudis when there's a strong suspicion that they fund terrorism.

No child left behind i dont know but if that was that School thing they had it aint workin i got to a highschool that hasnt had anything been rebuilt for 51 years, we use books from 1992, and the school is under supplied we have like hardly anything teachers last year ran out of paper in 2 months. But i may be wrong with that child thing but i know he passed some thing with School involving with him.[/quote:8b0a7]

this act does nothing to save bad schools, if anything it takes funding AWAY from schools that "fail" for a few years in a row. This means that schools that were already fucked up will only get worse, not better.

redhawk_six · 09-14-2003, 01:49 AM

[quote="Low spark":371cc]Envroinment.
Economy.
Education.
Foreign Relations.
Lack of vision for the future.[/quote:371cc]

ditto

Does he even have the smallest idea what the beef ban and softwood lumber tarif is doing to our economy? Farmers are lossing millions of dollars each day, and entire logging towns have turned into barren goast towns, leaving thousands of former loggers unemployed, unable to find work, and struggling just to feed their families. Very neighborly of you Bush. hake:

Eight Ace · 09-14-2003, 03:42 AM

...oh for fucks sake, you're a democracy...elections soon, if you're right...a man so "evil" as Bush
will surely be ejected and someone really nice will be elected and all the bad feelings will disappear.

...hey, why not vote for the Taliban if you really want to experiment.

SoLiDUS · 09-14-2003, 03:59 AM

Forget the entire thing and abolish government. Society could function just
as well, if not better without a coercive system impeding on our liberties. All
we need is a society founded on a rational ethical principle: the non
aggression principle. What we would need then would be guidelines
for the application of that principle in our everyday lives and an institutional
means of deciding when the principle had been violated. That is all...

Insightful link for would be principled anarchists:

[url:99e2d]http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Olympus/7695/CHAPTR08.HTM[/url:99e2d]

09-14-2003, 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SoLiDUS

Forget the entire thing and abolish government. Society could function just
as well, if not better without a coercive system impeding on our liberties. All
we need is a society founded on a rational ethical principle: the non
aggression principle. What we would need then would be guidelines
for the application of that principle in our everyday lives and an institutional
means of deciding when the principle had been violated. That is all...

Insightful link for would be principled anarchists:

[url:0ba86]http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Olympus/7695/CHAPTR08.HTM[/url:0ba86]

actually the original Federal government was much much smaller than it is today, basically they made sure states were nice to each other and made treaties with foreign nations, and that's about it.

Revere · 09-14-2003, 11:25 AM

Nuke the middle-east and our problems are solved. biggrin:

Low spark · 09-14-2003, 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Revere

Nuke the middle-east and our problems are solved. biggrin:

Thanks of for you opinion Mr. Rumsfield.

Proteus · 09-14-2003, 02:58 PM

[quote="Low spark":4f87d]Envroinment.
Economy.
Education.
Foreign Relations.
Lack of vision for the future.[/quote:4f87d]