Human Sexuality - Page 6

catalyst · 01-17-2004, 10:31 AM

1) The goal of sex is reproduction in nature. That's why they're called reproductive organs. I'm not sure how you could object to the fact that the real purpose of sex in it's essence is reproduction.

2) No, it does not affect me directly if two people are gay, but then again, it doesn't affect me if someone were to kill someone I didn't know. That's not my business, why should I care? But I do care because it's the morality of it all. It's not right to kill someone, that's why I care if someone did murder someone else, and being gay is not right, that's how it affects me.

3) By saying all you have, then finishing it off by saying that if someone doesn't like lesbians kissing then they are "the biggest fucking faggots in the world" you make yourself look very stupid.

MinorThreat · 01-17-2004, 02:06 PM

How can you compare two fairies pushing each others poop to murder?

They are nothing a like.

homo-sex is disturbing, yes, but there is no victim. No ones rights, liberties, or pursuit of happiness has been disturbed. Conscenting(sp?) adults having a go isn't anyones buisness but their own.

On the other hand, in a murder... there is by definition a victim who's rights and liberties have been taken away.

If some dude wants the screw another in the ass and not have the god damn common curtosey to give him a reach around then fine, but he better keep his poopsicle away from me.

Fireal · 01-17-2004, 03:56 PM

Who cares if they're gay. Have fun, fuck that dude in the ass.

Eight Ace · 01-17-2004, 04:08 PM

...yeah, all this talk about disgusting ass-fucking, poop-chutes etc., if a hot blonde wanted you to ignore her "natural"
front-bottom, and drill for Vegemite in her back-bottom, what are you gonna do..?... thought so, you kinky fuckers ed:

Fireal · 01-17-2004, 04:12 PM

Id stick it in the front bottom.

Eight Ace · 01-17-2004, 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by catalyst

1) The goal of sex is reproduction in nature. That's why they're called reproductive organs.
I'm not sure how you could object to the fact that the real purpose of sex in it's essence is reproduction.

Oh is that right..?*..unzzipppp..* ....well git yer mouth around this...science boy... rock:

Fireal · 01-17-2004, 04:17 PM

[quote="Eight Ace":c112a]

Quote:

Originally Posted by catalyst

1) The goal of sex is reproduction in nature. That's why they're called reproductive organs.
I'm not sure how you could object to the fact that the real purpose of sex in it's essence is reproduction.

Oh is that right..?*..unzzipppp..* ....well git yer mouth around this...science boy... rock:[/quote:c112a]

happy:

Madmartagen · 01-17-2004, 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by catalyst

1) The goal of sex is reproduction in nature. That's why they're called reproductive organs. I'm not sure how you could object to the fact that the real purpose of sex in it's essence is reproduction.

2) No, it does not affect me directly if two people are gay, but then again, it doesn't affect me if someone were to kill someone I didn't know. That's not my business, why should I care? But I do care because it's the morality of it all. It's not right to kill someone, that's why I care if someone did murder someone else, and being gay is not right, that's how it affects me.

3) By saying all you have, then finishing it off by saying that if someone doesn't like lesbians kissing then they are "the biggest fucking faggots in the world" you make yourself look very stupid.

I was talking about sex, not sexual reproduction. The intent is not to reproduce, just have sex.

Dude the last part was a joke and littered with sarcasm, ok? But I doubt anyone would object to witness such a glorious event like Monica Bellucci and Salma Hayek going at it.

Even though a murder of someone you don't know will not affect you, it does affect the family and friends of the one who was murdered. You can't compare homosexuality to murder, because one is violence inflicted on someone over their own will whereas homosexual intercourse is between two consenting adults and non violent.

[RSoBB]-ShotGunKenta · 01-17-2004, 04:28 PM

wow, 6 pages about the human sexuality sleeping:

catalyst · 01-17-2004, 05:29 PM

ok, then replace my example of murder with shoplifting. Say someone steals from a store, why the fuck do I care, it's not my store. But we do care, because society recognizes it as wrong, because it is.

Murder was just an example, I was not comparing the actual crimes, just the fact that they are both wrong even though the do not potentially affect someone.

Tripper · 01-17-2004, 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by catalyst

1) The goal of sex is reproduction in nature. That's why they're called reproductive organs. I'm not sure how you could object to the fact that the real purpose of sex in it's essence is reproduction

So sex between women and men when its simply for pleasure is wrong?

Using your logic it is, because the aim still isn't reproduction.

You should be happy that there is such a large amount of gay people in the world......They are a huge help to human society. They help slow down over-population (which is a VERY big problem), and many gay couples adopt parent-less children.

catalyst · 01-17-2004, 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tripper

Quote:

Originally Posted by catalyst

1) The goal of sex is reproduction in nature. That's why they're called reproductive organs. I'm not sure how you could object to the fact that the real purpose of sex in it's essence is reproduction

So sex between women and men when its simply for pleasure is wrong?

Using your logic it is, because the aim still isn't reproduction.

You should be happy that there is such a large amount of gay people in the world......They are a huge help to human society. They help slow down over-population (which is a VERY big problem), and many gay couples adopt parent-less children.

No, again, people aren't getting what I was saying. I was arguing with Martagemn (wtf ever his name is) about homsexuality being wrong naturally, because nature shows that is just doesn't work for gay people to be together by the fact that they can't reproduce. On the same lines, I said that the purpose of sex in nature is reproduction, because it is. I said that to show that he was wrong in saying homosexuality is correct in nature.

Madmartagen · 01-17-2004, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by catalyst

ok, then replace my example of murder with shoplifting. Say someone steals from a store, why the fuck do I care, it's not my store. But we do care, because society recognizes it as wrong, because it is.

Murder was just an example, I was not comparing the actual crimes, just the fact that they are both wrong even though the do not potentially affect someone.

You may not be affected by it, but the store owner is. Again, these two examples are dissimilar. Look, two people having sex doesnt bother you does it? Just think about it that way. Two consenting adults in the privacy of their own home. I don't have a problem with you not liking it, but I have a problem with people saying that it is wrong.

catalyst · 01-17-2004, 05:35 PM

And I have a problem with people saying it is right.

I'll leave it at that because this is obviously an issue to which there is no solid, agreeable answer, and I understand that.

Madmartagen · 01-17-2004, 05:44 PM

[img]http://www.xbox-connection.com/hostedimages/you%20big%20lug.jpg[/img]