Quote:
Originally Posted by MinorThreat
My point is that if canada had half the balls they'd make their own.
|
I guess you've never heard of a company called Diemaco, eh? They make all Canadian Forces small arms. Their located in Quebec. As for larger weapons, why would we make them when its cheaper to buy them? I don't see the connection between making weapons, and having balls either. Can you explain this to me?
[quote:3d15c]
Speaking of the canaidan millitary not having any balls I found out some little facts.
Roughly 22,000 canadians landed in normandy. of them like 1200 died (1 in 18 like the guy said before) on june 6.
(btw... 60,000 americans landed with approx 6000+ dieing, or 1 in 10)
But after june 6 the canadians really showed their stuff... between june 6 and june 20 around 350 canadians died. in the same time period OVER 3000 americans died...
WTF WHERE THE CANDIANS DOING?? sitting on the fucking beach drinking margaritas?
Canada exists soley for 18 year old americans to drive across the border to drink and go to titty bars.[/quote:3d15c]
Well since your so great on facts I'll let you in on a couple others. Canada's population during WWII was 10 million people total. 1 Million fought in WWII. That means 1 out of every 10 person in the entire country has military service. THta doesn't include pretty much everyone else who worked on the homefront for the war effort.
I dn't know how to answer your question. So because less of us died (which isn't a good thing to you) that must mean we didn't do what we were supposed to? Can you explain this to e as well?
The only answer I can give to that is
1) there were less of us, therefore less people to die
2) we fought with the british, so when the Canadians fought, the British fought as well, which probably resulted in British deaths. Perhaps if you added these two numbers together, plus all the commonwealth dead, you'd find your magic number?
3) maybe we're better at getting out of the way of bullets, shrapnel, mortars and artillery fire.