Mine-454*179 all together
Yours-378*230 all together
The way I see it width is not a factor as there is plenty of space horizontally to put something there. The rule seems to be set however to keep people from having to scroll throught a load of crap in peoples sig areas. Yours takes up more vertical space than mine.. If you dont believe me look at this..
calmdown: dude calm down im allowed my opininon didnt say every one has to agree with me i know why u do it and i love these forums you sent me a pm cause my sig was too big i changed it within minutes of the message **yes i have no life** rock: heres to alliedassault.com forums long may they rock rock:
[quote="_-=WB=-_ MotoxXx":d4881]Mine-454*179 all together
Yours-378*230 all together
The way I see it width is not a factor as there is plenty of space horizontally to put something there. The rule seems to be set however to keep people from having to scroll throught a load of crap in peoples sig areas. Yours takes up more vertical space than mine.. If you dont believe me look at this..
and yea I se i didnt crop it perfectly on yours but like I said I dont think horizontal width is a big deal unless its way out there[/quote:d4881]
Oh, i belive you. But thats not the point here.
The text is something that is controlled by the forum aswell, in ways of maximum characters.
What im saying is that your total "graphical" area is around 2500 pixels bigger than mine, and text has never been an issue to anyone before you came along.
what wtf did i say i was trying to be impartial but hey fek it now u google eyed tub of shit stop ya whinging and change the fukin size u big fukin baby
ps. after posting
nice of ya to change your post so u dont get booted