[-=[CF]=-Gen.Airborne]

I like Moh better because it has all the Skins and it gets kind laggy and theres not much Graphics.
What do you think??

[BlackJackal]

[quote="-=[CF]=-Gen.Airborne":9bde7]I like Moh better because it has all the Skins and it gets kind laggy and theres not much Graphics.
What do you think??[/quote:9bde7]
you like lagg? oOo:

[-=[CF]=-Gen.Airborne]

what i mean is BF is laggy and not much grahics but MOH has skins and uns and graphics.

[fujimi7su]

1. BF is only laggy cause of your shitty pc

2. MOH looks like shit and cant keep up w/ modern games

3. speak in english i dont know what "theres not much graphics" is supposed to mean.

[imported_Grim_Reaper]

any of the battlefield series is way better than mohaa. mohaa has alot of mods to keep it alive and interesting. BF:V is great with just the stock stuff.

[Short Hand]

MOH only has 2 half decent mods, Hell In the Pacific, & Modern Warfare. City Nights is shit don't say it.

While BF has probably hundreds of mods out for it all fun.

MO is only good now to hack and watch nerds get pissed and blow a fuse.

[Maplegyver]

Originally Posted by fujimi7su

1. BF is only laggy cause of your shitty pc

2. MOH looks like shit and cant keep up w/ modern games

3. speak in english i dont know what "theres not much graphics" is supposed to mean.

ROFL

[Buggy]

Originally Posted by maple

ROFL

I'm not a noob and i love Mohaa, on the other hand I despise any BF, except BF:V.

[Pyro]

MOHAA > BF1942 > COD

[Bucknub]

Originally Posted by Pyro

MOHAA > BF1942 > COD

eek:

[bukdez]

BF and MOH:AA are very different because of the vehicles... i like vehicles...

[fujimi7su]

grave digging eh buk?