Alliedassault           
FAQ Calendar
Go Back   Alliedassault > Lounge > Politics, Current Events & History
Reload this Page Details of US microwave-weapon tests revealed
Politics, Current Events & History Debates on politics, current events, and world history.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Details of US microwave-weapon tests revealed
Old
  (#1)
Mr.Buttocks is Offline
Major General
 
Mr.Buttocks's Avatar
 
Posts: 12,924
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Continent of Africa
   
Default Details of US microwave-weapon tests revealed - 07-23-2005, 09:42 AM

[url=http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg18725095.600:0233f]Link to article...[/url:0233f]

[quote:0233f]
VOLUNTEERS taking part in tests of the Pentagon's "less-lethal" microwave weapon were banned from wearing glasses or contact lenses due to safety fears. The precautions raise concerns about how safe the Active Denial System (ADS) weapon would be if used in real crowd-control situations.

The ADS fires a 95-gigahertz microwave beam, which is supposed to heat skin and to cause pain but no physical damage (New Scientist, 27 October 2001, p 26). Little information about its effects has been released, but details of tests in 2003 and 2004 were revealed after Edward Hammond, director of the US Sunshine Project - an organisation campaigning against the use of biological and non-lethal weapons - requested them under the Freedom of Information Act.

The tests were carried out at Kirtland Air Force Base in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Two experiments tested pain tolerance levels, while in a third, a "limited military utility assessment", volunteers played the part of rioters or intruders and the ADS was used to drive them away.

The experimenters banned glasses and contact lenses to prevent possible eye damage to the subjects, and in the second and third tests removed any metallic objects such as coins and keys to stop hot spots being created on the skin. They also checked the volunteers' clothes for certain seams, buttons and zips which might also cause hot spots.

The ADS weapon's beam causes pain within 2 to 3 seconds and it becomes intolerable after less than 5 seconds. People's reflex responses to the pain is expected to force them to move out of the beam before their skin can be burnt.

But Neil Davison, co-ordinator of the non-lethal weapons research project at the University of Bradford in the UK, says controlling the amount of radiation received may not be that simple. "How do you ensure that the dose doesn't cross the threshold for permanent damage?" he asks. "What happens if someone in a crowd is unable, for whatever reason, to move away from the beam? Does the weapon cut out to prevent overexposure?"

During the experiments, people playing rioters put up their hands when hit and were given a 15-second cooling-down period before being targeted again. One person suffered a burn in a previous test when the beam was accidentally used on the wrong power setting.

A vehicle-mounted version of ADS called Sheriff could be in service in Iraq in 2006 according to the Department of Defense, and it is also being evaluated by the US Department of Energy for use in defending nuclear facilities. The US marines and police are both working on portable versions, and the US air force is building a system for controlling riots from the air.[/quote:0233f]
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2)
Tripper is Offline
General of the Army
 
Posts: 18,895
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
   
Default 07-23-2005, 03:53 PM

Sounds like they have a long way to go before this even gets a serious consideration for domestic use.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
Stammer is Offline
Captain
 
Posts: 5,021
Join Date: Mar 2005
   
Default 07-23-2005, 04:19 PM

Officer Ted : Hey, guys could you remove any metals in your pockets and what have you so we can fry your asses? Kthx
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
Coleman is Offline
Major General
 
Coleman's Avatar
 
Posts: 13,482
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: University Park, PA
   
Default 07-23-2005, 04:38 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tripper
Sounds like they have a long way to go before this even gets a serious consideration for domestic use.
nah, that's easy. Just pass a law that prohibits anyone from carrying metal objects. Plastic is the way to go!111 beer: biggrin:


  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5)
Poseidon is Offline
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 3,358
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Good ol' England!
   
Default 07-23-2005, 04:45 PM

could be a neat idea, but is only in its early stages and needs much development.
  
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.