[Short Hand]

Originally Posted by TGB!

Yanno, if I took those special steroids that allowed me to subsist on nothing but recycled newspaper and the anal-juice of the Canadian homeless - then I too might be able to prioritize and get some silly overpriced TV. Sadly, my testicles and dick are nice and healthy, and I have a Dynex. Boohoo for me.

On a side note - I never really played GoW before - but holy beejebus this game looks nice.

Until you have viewed an Aquos, you can really not say anything. Lets put this into terms you will understand.

-You just bought a Kodak EasyShare Camera. (Dycrap)

-A Sharp Aquos is a lovely NIkon DSLR.


The lifespan on that Aquos will DOUBLE the life of the Dycrap, Give you a picture to die for, have more in's and outs... better build quality.. yadda yadda yadda. And to boot, I have seen 32 inch modles only about 200 $ more then yours. .


If you were looking for a good deal, you should have looked at a Viewsonic. BEST bang for your buck LCD's on the market.

[TGB!]

Congratulations. You just compared apples to oranges. Kodak - to the best of my knowledge - doesn't make a dSLR. For an APT comparison, you should have compared a Pentax to a Nikon - both of which will get the job done and take fantastic pictures - while one sacrifices features and build quality. If this TV last long enough for HDTV's to drop into the sub 300/200 area for 32inchers - itll be a win in my column.

Look son - don't be cross now; if you wan't to spend oodles of cash on "name brand" and assure yourself it really WAS worth all that - be my guest. I paid 450 bucks for a cheap ass HDTV that has performed quite spectacularly for what it is used for (gaming and hd downloads) and will pocket that extra change and buy myself a Jenna Jameson rubber pussy or something.