Alliedassault           
FAQ Calendar
Go Back   Alliedassault > FPS Gaming General Discussion > MoH General Discussion
Reload this Page BAR is being inaccurately portrayed, I think
MoH General Discussion General Discussion about Medal of Honor: Allied Assault, expansions and Pacific Assault

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
BAR is being inaccurately portrayed, I think
Old
  (#1)
Rocket is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 445
Join Date: Jun 2002
 Send a message via ICQ to Rocket  
Default BAR is being inaccurately portrayed, I think - 11-26-2002, 12:04 PM

I just read a book that was written by a Marine who served in the Pacific. in it he stated some interesting facts about the BAR. Due to the gas action on the gun, it actually pulled forward when firing: a reverse kick. He even went as far as saying that an unsuspecting operator of the gun ran the risk of doing a forward flip/fall if he wasn't prepared. I'll admit I haven't done further research yet, but this seems to be a major oversight.

Would it be possible to mod the BAR to have an accurate negative kick?
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2)
Rimmel is Offline
Member
 
Posts: 56
Join Date: Nov 2002
   
Default 11-26-2002, 12:49 PM

who cares?
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
Bane is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 703
Join Date: Oct 2002
   
Default 11-26-2002, 12:53 PM

Obviously Rocket cares Rimmel, so STFU.

Try posting this in the Maps, Mods & Skins forum if you haven't already. It sounds interesting. Keep us posted on any more info you come across.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
GhostRider2AD is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 131
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Silently Stalking You! Did you See That? No, it must Be a Ghost!
   
Default 11-26-2002, 12:55 PM

It would be interesting to find out if it could be modded.GR swordfight:
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5)
Airborne Butters is Offline
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 3,907
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SouthWest, Florida.
  Send a message via AIM to Airborne Butters  
Default 11-26-2002, 01:02 PM

Actually I'd post it in offtopic or history

But back to the topic, the Marines actually modified theres. This could have caused the problem with it 'jumping foward'. But it still did jump foward a little. If you ever look at the bars in the filed, Soliders often fired them a point down to the ground just a little, so when they jumped foward they'd point more straight. Also notice how the mono-pods were more 'skid feet' rather than 'spike feet'.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6)
Panzerman is Offline
Member
 
Posts: 32
Join Date: Nov 2002
   
Default 11-26-2002, 01:06 PM

The BAR is a pretty typical gas-operated automatic rifle - it kicks back, but not quite as hard as a bolt action of the same caliber (30'06, in this case). Basically, whoever wrote that book is full of shit. I've fired a BAR, and it kicks up and back hard enough that it's difficult to keep it pointed at a distant target in rapid fire - the MoHAA BAR is pretty close, IMO.

It'd be pretty goddamn difficult to get any gun using a cartridge that size to "pull" instead of "kick" (even if it wieghs 19 lbs), and I'd imagine that the army would reject such a weapon out of hand, anyway. And think of the sheer rediculousness of fitting a gun that "recoils" forward with a shoulder stock - it would need a strap to keep it stuck to you, if anything.

Cheers,

Pman
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7)
Airborne Butters is Offline
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 3,907
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SouthWest, Florida.
  Send a message via AIM to Airborne Butters  
Default 11-26-2002, 01:58 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Panzerman
The BAR is a pretty typical gas-operated automatic rifle - it kicks back, but not quite as hard as a bolt action of the same caliber (30'06, in this case). Basically, whoever wrote that book is full of shit. I've fired a BAR, and it kicks up and back hard enough that it's difficult to keep it pointed at a distant target in rapid fire - the MoHAA BAR is pretty close, IMO.

It'd be pretty goddamn difficult to get any gun using a cartridge that size to "pull" instead of "kick" (even if it wieghs 19 lbs), and I'd imagine that the army would reject such a weapon out of hand, anyway. And think of the sheer rediculousness of fitting a gun that "recoils" forward with a shoulder stock - it would need a strap to keep it stuck to you, if anything.

Cheers,

Pman
I'm gonna have to disagree wit ya Bob! I have a book on weapons of all caliber, about 300 pgs+. The bar you might have fired, could have been a more recent version or a recopy. Like I said in my previouse post, why would the tri-pod legs be pointed more foward, if it kicked back?
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8)
Panzerman is Offline
Member
 
Posts: 32
Join Date: Nov 2002
   
Default 11-26-2002, 02:24 PM

I've never shot a gun with rearward pointing bipod legs - they're there for support, not to reduce recoil. You absorb recoil with your body, not with the ground.

The BAR I fired was all original parts, except the trigger/sear assembly which was modified to make it semi-auto only. That had no impact on the gas-piston action, which Rocket implies is responsible for the "pull". I suppose someone expecting the same kick that a Garand or Springfield '03 delivers might in fact jerk forward in anticipation of recoil when firing (I have a tendancy to do this when I pick up a .22 cal rifle after firing my 8mm Mauser all day), but it's certainly not any mechanical feature of the gun causing it.

Edit: Just found this! Tell me if that looks like "pull"

http://members.ozemail.com.au/~mickay/bar.htm

Cheers!

Panzerman
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9)
Thermopyle is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 178
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Syracuse, NY
 Send a message via ICQ to Thermopyle  
Default 11-26-2002, 02:39 PM

Probably be best to find more than one source that says the BAR pulled you forward when fired, as that would defy one of the most fundamental laws of mechanics.

If it is true eek: , then that would be awfully weird in the game. All the more reason to just stick to a bolt action.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10)
Sgt>Stackem is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,161
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Detroit, MI
   
Default 11-26-2002, 07:04 PM

i doubt it would move forward. That video looked awesome! What I have read about them is that the barrel can melt if it is fired too much
mb
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#11)
-atticus- is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 208
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Running around the map unarmed while trying to make myself an easy target for mortars.
   
Default 11-26-2002, 07:07 PM

panzerman that video kicked ass....that chick was baddass.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#12)
reimer21 is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 235
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA
   
Default 11-26-2002, 10:58 PM

I am behind you Panzerman! I have also fired one and there was no reverse recoil. And the bipod legs are not for recoil.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#13)
Onor_Deception[Sgt] is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 400
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: USA
   
Default 11-26-2002, 11:16 PM

(On Subject) It couldnt be modded to "pull" w/o the SDK........
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#14)
r3mix is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 896
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Oz
   
Default 11-27-2002, 02:06 AM

do we run like a dumbest thread of the year award here ?
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#15)
Miscguy is Offline
2nd Lieutenant
 
Posts: 3,811
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Redmond, Home of Microsoft
  Send a message via MSN to Miscguy  
Default 11-27-2002, 02:28 AM

We could. What day should we hold the cerimony? and who will make the SIG medal to be worn by the few and proud?
  
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.