bush

Peegoo · **bush -** 11-27-2003, 08:25 PM

seems a lot hate bush. he's not good at speeches and has lied. but why can't cany of you get it through your thick stupid head that without him you'll be facing a very big threat from the middle east. bush didn't start the war on terrorism, osama brought it to us. if we hadn't goen over to iraq, think about how many more civilians would get torturned and killed. why did our soldiers fight in ww2? to stop dictatorship.

im surprised how weak americ has become over the years. dman hippies and their anti-war crap. if we don't strike now, in the future they enemy will be a lot stronger and we're going to have to send our troops against a much larger enemy, an enemy we should of destryoyed when they were still weaker.

anyways it's thanksgiving. thank your president for not letting the terrorist punks get to us.

11-27-2003, 08:39 PM

Any president would have struck at terrorists after 9-11,
the problem with Bush is he's not half the diplomat that his predecessors were, and unlike his father he did not suceed at building a large coalition against Iraq, so its just us and the UK (all the useless countries like Lativa who are "helping" are sending about a platoon of poorly trained troops each oOo: )

Wilko · 11-27-2003, 08:55 PM

[quote="Sgt Stryker":a5fff]Any president would have struck at terrorists after 9-11,
the problem with Bush is he's not half the diplomat that his predecessors were, and unlike his father he did not suceed at building a large coalition against Iraq, so its just us and the UK (all the useless countries like Lativa who are "helping" are sending about a platoon of poorly trained troops each oOo: )[/quote:a5fff]
Ahem...
[img]http://www.3dflags.com/assets/XV21AE/gif/2/a/3dflagsdotcom_austr_2fagl.gif[/img]
"A Platoon of Poorly trained troops"? Dude, We sent over the SAS, which shit all over your precious USMC.
Also, we sent over a reasonable force from both the RAN and the RAAF.
In addition, we've made ourselves a bigger Terrorist target for helping you blokes in your wars around the Middle East, so, yeah, give us a bit more credit than referring to us as "One of the useless countries", eh? We did our share in Iraq, don't worry about that. hake:

11-27-2003, 09:08 PM

[quote="Captain Wilkins":b226b][quote="Sgt Stryker":b226b]Any president would have struck at terrorists after 9-11,
the problem with Bush is he's not half the diplomat that his predecessors were, and unlike his father he did not suceed at building a large coalition against Iraq, so its just us and the UK (all the useless countries like Lativa who are "helping" are sending about a platoon of poorly trained troops each oOo: )[/quote:b226b]
Ahem...
[img]http://www.3dflags.com/assets/XV21AE/gif/2/a/3dflagsdotcom_austr_2fagl.gif[/img]
"A Platoon of Poorly trained troops"? Dude, We sent over the SAS, which shit all over your precious USMC.
Also, we sent over a reasonable force from both the RAN and the RAAF.
In addition, we've made ourselves a bigger Terrorist target for helping you blokes in your wars around the Middle East, so, yeah, give us a bit more credit than referring to us as "One of the useless countries", eh? We did our share in Iraq, don't worry about that. hake:[/quote:b226b]

when I said UK I meant the commonwealth troops too
no insult intended whatsoever

you guys did a wonderful job alongside Doug MacArthur in WW2 and I would never intentionally insult the Aussie tropps or Australia

ninty · 11-27-2003, 09:35 PM

The war on terror and the Iraq war had nothing to do with each other.

WWII was fought because Hitler decided to invade Poland. I don't think we had much of a choice back then. Saddam wasn't trying to take over the world or pressing his ideals on other countries. There are many countries around the world that are just as bad if not worse than Iraq was.

Pre-emptive strike is not a very good idea either. Thats fine if the US wants to protect itself and rid threats. But what stops Israle from tearing the shit out of palestine? Or N Korea taking on south korea, or Iran marching into Pakistan or Turkmenistan? Once the US does these things, they forefit the power to tell others not to do so.

Art Attack · 11-27-2003, 09:48 PM

I'm glad Canada didn't get in on the war war in iraq for two reasons, my uncle, could have been shipped and now I hear of threats against London and all, Canada doesn't need that shit.

Wilko · 11-27-2003, 10:23 PM

[quote="Sgt Stryker":c0196][quote="Captain Wilkins":c0196][quote="Sgt Stryker":c0196]Any president would have struck at terrorists after 9-11,
the problem with Bush is he's not half the diplomat that his predecessors were, and unlike his father he did not suceed at building a large coalition against Iraq, so its just us and the UK (all the useless countries like Lativa who are "helping" are sending about a platoon of poorly trained troops each oOo: )[/quote:c0196]
Ahem...
[img]http://www.3dflags.com/assets/XV21AE/gif/2/a/3dflagsdotcom_austr_2fagl.gif[/img]
"A Platoon of Poorly trained troops"? Dude, We sent over the SAS, which shit all over your precious USMC.
Also, we sent over a reasonable force from both the RAN and the RAAF.
In addition, we've made ourselves a bigger Terrorist target for helping you blokes in your wars around the Middle East, so, yeah, give us a bit more credit than referring to us as "One of the useless countries", eh? We did our share in Iraq, don't worry about that. hake:[/quote:c0196]

when I said UK I meant the commonwealth troops too
no insult intended whatsoever

you guys did a wonderful job alongside Doug MacArthur in WW2 and I would never intentionally insult the Aussie tropps or Australia[/quote:c0196]

No Probs, Dude. I just tend to get a tad protective of my country, is all cool:

Madmartagen · 11-27-2003, 11:31 PM

im glad we went into baghdad, i couldnt sleep at night w/o wondering if the republican guard was going to storm in my house and kill me. war on terror took a fuckin U turn when we decided to go into iraq and occupy it. we should have just blown the shit out of saddam w/o letting him know we were coming.

yODa · 11-27-2003, 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ninty9

The war on terror and the Iraq war had nothing to do with each other.

WWII was fought because Hitler decided to invade Poland. I don't think we had much of a choice back then. Saddam wasn't trying to take over the world or pressing his ideals on other countries. There are many countries around the world that are just as bad if not worse than Iraq was.

Pre-emptive strike is not a very good idea either. Thats fine if the US wants to protect itself and rid threats. But what stops Israle from tearing the shit out of palestine? Or N Korea taking on south korea, or Iran marching into Pakistan or Turkmenistan? Once the US does these things, they forefit the power to tell others not to do so.

u should watch the news,its palestine whos attacking israle,israle is just fighting back to keep their country safe.

RaNgeR · 11-28-2003, 12:25 AM

Bush..... annoy:

I thought what he did was right, after 9-11. NOT IN IRAQ

Also, SAS = rock:

Madmartagen · 11-28-2003, 12:27 AM

palestine is a different situation. the israelis have a right to defend themselves from all the possilble dangers. it just takes one bomber with a bag of chemicals to ruin their day.

RaNgeR · 11-28-2003, 12:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Madmartagen

palestine is a different situation. the israelis have a right to defend themselves from all the possilble dangers. it just takes one bomber with a bag of chemicals to ruin their day.

You are right mad.

Unknown_Sniper · 11-28-2003, 12:39 AM

yeah bush is stupid. Take his recent trip to baghdad for instance. HE was there for all of 1 hour which he spent in a hangar at the airport so he didnt have ot get too close ot the action. Dude.... hake: As for peegoo you just a stupid fool. you will learn one day that inciting things liek this makes you hated.

yODa · 11-28-2003, 05:15 PM

im just curious do brits have a diffrent language besides english,not a formal kind but like a slang type?,u know wat i mean?

ninty · 11-28-2003, 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yODa

Quote:

Originally Posted by ninty9

The war on terror and the Iraq war had nothing to do with each other.

WWII was fought because Hitler decided to invade Poland. I don't think we had much of a choice back then. Saddam wasn't trying to take over the world or pressing his ideals on other countries. There are many countries around the world that are just as bad if not worse than Iraq was.

Pre-emptive strike is not a very good idea either. Thats fine if the US wants to protect itself and rid threats. But what stops Israle from tearing the shit out of palestine? Or N Korea taking on south korea, or Iran marching into Pakistan or Turkmenistan? Once the US does these things, they forefit the power to tell others not to do so.

u should watch the news,its palestine whos attacking israle,israle is just fighting back to keep their country safe.

Maybe you should go back to school and understand what i'm saying.

Would an invasion of Palestine be justified currenty? I doubt it. So if Bush can go into Iraq to wipe out that country, what is stopping the Isralies from going into palestine and wiping out them?