Flight 93, Whats The Real Story Behind It??

Captain Bunny · **Flight 93, Whats The Real Story Behind It?? -** 09-13-2002, 07:26 PM

I read an artical in a newspaper, it was a grown ups paper, you know, the ones that use big words and there isnt a single nakid woman in it (why the hell was i reading a proper newspaper?!) anyway, it has a full page related to flight 93, that several eye witnesses had seen a white fighter with no markings head at sonic boom speed to where flight 93 was, then shortly after the plane flew over, flight 93 was down. Initially the FBI hushed all witness' and said there was no plane at all in the area. then they changed their story and said it was a recon plane sent to take pictures of the wreckage. There aslo claimed to be tapes with people onboard talking about wind noise (caused by a hole in the fuselage) and also about some white smoke - but in a link i posted the other day, you hear the passangers talk about black smoke.
im sorry i dont have anything to back this up as the paper is at my girlfriends house, but seriously, what do you all think about what really happened. I really think the government is hidding something about it. Please keep this decent and dont flame me for my views or say im media brainwashed - ive been thinking it was shot down long before the 1 year anniversary.

09-13-2002, 07:30 PM

Theres smoking guns related to everything. This is probably one of them.

09-13-2002, 07:39 PM

c: doesn't matter to me, either way an attack was stopped.

Zap. USMC · 09-13-2002, 07:41 PM

Not to mention most of that is probably bullshit. Give me real proof and I'll consider it.

ninty · 09-13-2002, 07:43 PM

I never heard that. I'm sure if it did happen like that we wouldn't hear anything like that. But I did watch a thing on TV about it. They said fighters were 70 miles away fromintercepting it when it went down. To far for them to shoot it down of course. They also talked to a witness who didn't say anything about a fighter. He said that it was going up and down and then nose dived into teh ground. If it had been shot down I think it would have been too much to cover up. Too many witnesses and information from norad and other radar sites would ahve shown it. I doubt it was shot down.

EDIT: Forgot to include that there are a lot of crazy people out there. What about things like UFO and stuff. people say a lot of things for many different reasons. Some want to believe it so much that they see it or imagine it and some are crazy sons of bitches. Some may make up stories for publicity. Ya just never know. Something to consider maybe.

Captain Bunny · 09-13-2002, 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ninty9

Too many witnesses and information from norad and other radar sites would ahve shown it. I doubt it was shot down.
.

Well, according to a government statement, the terrorists who hi-jacked the one that hit the pentagon switched off some radar stuff or whatever, and so it couldnt be tracked. maybe same could have happened to 93.
ohh, to add to my original post, the eyewitness said it was a twin engine, with a spoiler (like off a car) connecting 2 tail fins. she said she looked it up on the net but couldnt find a match, she said it was flying very low. the fbi when they changed their story, said it was flying at 3000ft. hmm

ohh, and this in an interesting read.

http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?las ... id=1157682

Lt.Jones · 09-13-2002, 08:25 PM

An airtraffic controller says that there were no U.S. fighters anywhere in the area when 93 went down.

Arkan · 09-16-2002, 08:52 AM

Here are my belief's from the very beginning.....

I believe the plane was shot down and here's why i believe that....
1. The 1st plane (flight 11) took off at 0802 and was hijacked at 0828. It slammed into tower 1 at 0848.
2. The 3rd doomed flight (flight 77) which crashed into the Pentagon took off at 0810 and was crashed at 0940. During that time, fighter planes were enroute to intercept but got there too late.
3. The last plane to crash (flight 93) took off at 0801 and finally crashed at 1020.
4. Now, if you look at the times between flights 77 and 93, you'll notice there was a 40 minute time span between crashes with fighter planes already in the air. Are you trying to tell me that a fighter plane with 40 minutes to play with couldn't intercept that last plane?? The 1st hijack warning went out at approx 0830 hrs.....thats almost 2 hrs to the last crash so you know fighter planes were in the air.
5. On the day of the events, i heard reports of a passenger on the plane talking to a loved one describing a small explosion and the cabin was filling up with white smoke. I never heard of that report since that day!!
6. This is the most compelling evidence......a debris field was discovered 6 miles away from the crash site in the opposite direction of the flight path!! Now, just take a look at all this evidence and you can see why i feel the plane was shot down.

The people on that plane did indeed stage a counter attack but it was too late for them. The plane was taken down over a field to minimize casualties. Well, thankful to the government, the media was all over the heros on that plane making their (the government) coverup a breeze. They all took that "hero" story and ran with it!
Whether that plane was shot down or not, it was gonna crash anyway so those people were heros. They did take a stand and they did battle those bastard terrorists but they were doomed and they knew it so regardless, they were all very brave!!
This post or my views wasn't meant to undermine those brave people. In my heart, that plane was shot down and we, the public, was led to believe otherwise.
God Bless all who perished on 9/11.......except those 19 terrorists (may they rot in hell).

Hollywood · 09-16-2002, 10:12 AM

I remeber when it happened, an eye witness said he saw either one or two jets flying by as it went down. Also, the passengers on the plane said they heard an explosion, or an explosion could be heard in the background, when the cell phone was left behind by the passengers that staged the counter-attack. This leads to the assupmtion that it was indeed shot down, not to mention that it crashed in a non populated field.

Colonel · 09-16-2002, 01:43 PM

I think it was shot down by black helicopters that took off from the grassy knoll.

Old Reliable · 09-16-2002, 02:22 PM

09-25-2002, 09:02 AM

[quote="Captain Bunny":07b7a][quote=ninty9] Too many witnesses and information from norad and other radar sites would ahve shown it. I doubt it was shot down.
.[/quote]

Well, according to a government statement, the terrorists who hi-jacked the one that hit the pentagon switched off some radar stuff or whatever, and so it couldnt be tracked. maybe same could have happened to 93.
ohh, to add to my original post, the eyewitness said it was a twin engine, with a spoiler (like off a car) connecting 2 tail fins. she said she looked it up on the net but couldnt find a match, she said it was flying very low. the fbi when they changed their story, said it was flying at 3000ft. hmm

ohh, and this in an interesting read.

[url="http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?lastnode_id=388856&node_id=1157682"]http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?las ... id=1157682[/url][/quote:07b7a]

transponder, every civilian jetliner has one, it transmits the flight number, etc. that shows up on air traffic control radar, sort of like an ID tag that sends messages.

Sgt>Stackem · 09-25-2002, 01:56 PM

surface to air missle! Thats what I think!
mb

09-25-2002, 03:03 PM

if it was sam than people would of seen it. i think what happened was the guys try to kill the terrorists and the terrorist were in troule so they just flew the plane into the ground.

09-25-2002, 03:06 PM

if it was sam than people would of seen it. i think what happened was the guys try to kill the terrorists and the terrorist were in troule so they just flew the plane into the ground.