[Ydiss]

Originally Posted by dedwards77

Besides the poor framerate and lag i thought it was pretty good.

Lol. Besides the fundamental aspect of what makes an FPS fun to play lacking, it's "pretty good". Low standards yet again.

[quote:b55df]Maybe the full version will be better. [/quote:b55df] I'd be willing to bet a year's wages on that not happening. Where have you been for the past year and a half? Presumably not playing EA games.

[quote:b55df]Well, I haven't got the demo. I don't like demos.

I always wait for the full game.[/quote:b55df] Not clever when it comes to EA.

[quote:b55df]Anyway, When I started playing spearhead I thought, "well, this is okay". After a week or 2 I returned to Allied assault. It was just better than sh - Spearhead, I didn't like it at all. ANd none of my friends liked it either. But after a couple of months, I decided to give it one more chance. - I have been playing spearhead ever since then, and I like it a lot.[/quote:b55df]

That's the problem here. For lack of anything else to play people go back to SH and all of a sudden the poor frame-rates, excessive packet loss, glitchy performance, buggy grenades, butt-sliding, crappy directional sound, juddery controls and all the other things that reduce the fun of the game are no longer a problem.

I bought SH second hand and I will never buy another EA product again because I know a poor, shoddy and below-average game when I see one.

It's all opinions at the end of the day, but in this case I just know my opinion holds more common sense. COD, in just 5 minutes worth of play, totally whipes the floor with MOH:BT. Utterly.

And then just watch the tech demos of HL2 and you should see where I'm coming from on this.