Alliedassault           
FAQ Calendar
Go Back   Alliedassault > FPS Gaming General Discussion > MoH General Discussion
Reload this Page What do you prefer in game? Springfield '03 or the Mauser ka
MoH General Discussion General Discussion about Medal of Honor: Allied Assault, expansions and Pacific Assault

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old
  (#1)
Lorenz is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 190
Join Date: Jan 2002
   
Default 01-28-2002, 12:01 AM

I don't usually snipe but when i do its always with the KAR. It's sights are less intrusive and allow to make easier shots on people who are on the move.

------------------
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2)
KangSa is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 240
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Berlin, NAZI Germany 1944
 Send a message via ICQ to KangSa Send a message via MSN to KangSa  
Default 01-28-2002, 06:36 AM

Hey DaFladow, I just think the KAR sniper rifle is superior compared to the Allied one is because of the scope. The Allied scope simply blocks your view...You know the vertical line? The KAR scope doesn't block your view, that's how I compare em'

------------------
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
sgt.sayian is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 332
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hamilton,Ont,Canada
   
Default 01-28-2002, 07:00 AM

I totally agree with you on everything
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
Oddball is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 991
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Queensland,Australia
   
Default 01-28-2002, 07:23 AM

EA really got it right with the Mauser.

1) The bolt was real close to the trigger allowing for a real quick reload and a faster rate of fire than the Springfield. So if two sniper fre at once and miss the German snip[er will have the advantage.

2)The "T" crosshair makes the field of vision so much better.

3) Yes it does sound much better.

------------------


More negative waves Moriartii! Have a litte faith baby, have a little faith.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5)
Speculator is Offline
Member
 
Posts: 65
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: California
 Send a message via ICQ to Speculator  
Default 01-28-2002, 07:41 AM

Yep, I would also take the Mauser K98. The scope is way better than the Springfield's because of its "T" crosshair; the reload times are much faster too. As for sound, I kinda like the Springfield's better.

------------------


Shermans, ahh what a marvel of a light machine
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6)
madrebel is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 534
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Newport Beach CA
 Send a message via ICQ to madrebel  
Default 01-28-2002, 08:43 AM

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Tahoma, Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Oddball:
EA really got it right with the Mauser.

1) The bolt was real close to the trigger allowing for a real quick reload and a faster rate of fire than the Springfield. So if two sniper fre at once and miss the German snip[er will have the advantage.

2)The "T" crosshair makes the field of vision so much better.

3) Yes it does sound much better.

<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

if yooure a stickler for reality you should also mention that the german optics throughout the war(including something as small as the sniper scope) were far superior to their allied counter-parts.

in this game they re identical with only the crosshair to differentiate the two.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7)
8827Echo is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 668
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Perth, Australia
 Send a message via ICQ to 8827Echo  
Default 01-28-2002, 08:45 AM

You could probably change the crosshairs for the rifles...
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8)
DaFladow is Offline
Member
 
Posts: 67
Join Date: Jan 2002
 Send a message via ICQ to DaFladow  
Default 01-28-2002, 09:04 AM

My main role in my clan is as a sniper. I have been experimenting with the allied and axis sniper rifles, and i have come to these conclusions. Please tell me if my assumtions are accurate, and what rifle you prefer and why.

1) I absolutely hate the crosshairs on the Springfield. The upper croshair is not necessary, and it only blocks the view of your tragets upper body, so you cant tell where his head is from his torso. Makes it hard to snipe when all the target is doing is sticking his head out.

2) I have noticed, correct me if im wrong, that the springfield has a longer delay between shots, and between the time you click the mouse and the actual time the bullet fires than the Mauser. I know your initial thoughts " hes probly on 56k thats why" or "hes lagging", but no im a cable ISP with a 41 ping usually.

3)On a less important side the Mauser seems quieter to me... oh wells.

Oh, and please post any of your observations. about recoil and stuff.

Post your replies, and your choice of rifle and thanks.

------------------
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9)
acgreen is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 244
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Northern California
   
Default 01-28-2002, 09:57 AM

I like the Mauser better.

1) I think it actually has faster reload times (i.e., the time it takes to pull the bolt back and shove another bullet in). In single player, this is true, but I'm not sure in multiplayer.

2) I think it sounds a hell of a lot better...

3) You're right about the crosshair thing. I don't like it either.


------------------
Huked un foniks wurkde for me!

------------------
If "con" is the opposite of "pro," then what is the opposite of progress?
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10)
DaFladow is Offline
Member
 
Posts: 67
Join Date: Jan 2002
 Send a message via ICQ to DaFladow  
Default 01-28-2002, 10:09 AM

thanks for the feedback. I really hate that Springfield scope.

------------------
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#11)
Frogy is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 283
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
 Send a message via ICQ to Frogy  
Default 01-28-2002, 10:10 AM

DaFladow
I agree with you 100%, but, I'm a allied sniper.... I'd drop it anyday to pick up a mauser though...
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#12)
mercenary is Offline
Junior Member
 
Posts: 14
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: [DA]
   
Default 01-28-2002, 10:13 AM

I would have to agree with you on this, I like the mauser more because of the...
1)Sound
2)Crosshair
3)In most maps I prefer to be AXIS

I think that the springfield Xhair should be a few pixels narrower so it is easier to pull off long shots with rifle, and so you can see your target behind the crosshair.

------------------
-If you see the flash, your already dead-
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#13)
madrebel is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 534
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Newport Beach CA
 Send a message via ICQ to madrebel  
Default 01-28-2002, 10:31 AM

zeiss optics = l33t
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#14)
Patton is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 119
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Fairview Park, OH, USA
 Send a message via ICQ to Patton  
Default 01-28-2002, 10:52 AM

I actually prefer the sights on the springfield more. I seem to be able to follow a target easier with them. I don't know why exactly, but I can shoot moving targets MUCH easier with it.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#15)
BMillis is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 250
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: AZ,USA
 Send a message via ICQ to BMillis  
Default 01-28-2002, 11:37 AM

Springfield....
Takes a little more to get a head shot....

------------------

We are recruiting http://bmillis.tripod.com
  
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.