Another slanted opinion about BF 1942

TapDown · **Another slanted opinion about BF 1942 -** 10-19-2002, 07:26 PM

I am extremely disappointed with this game.
I figured this would be a good single player game but it reminds me of playing a single player match of QIII with Commodore Vic 28 graphics.
Not worth the money IMHO.
Perhaps the novelty lies with being able to operate different pieces of weaponry? I don't know if I'm missing something here but it sucks flying a plane when there are no instruments. Maybe they work with a different video setting? I dunno.............
Just thought I'd share. oOo:

DJBUCKSHOT · 10-19-2002, 07:34 PM

I too was very dissapointed by this game, lots of people absolutly adore it and say its 10 times better than MOHAA. I really dont see how, the playability is -20/20. Besides, its like constantly having people with rockets in mohaa, cos all people ever have is a tank, ffs!

The games shite - spearhead will put the game to shame

TapDown · 10-19-2002, 09:55 PM

[quote:7455d]Besides, its like constantly having people with rockets in mohaa, cos all people ever have is a tank, ffs![/quote:7455d]
I can't agree more.

rudedog · 10-19-2002, 10:16 PM

Sorry guys moved to off topic.

BTW BF is a totaly different type of game. I would compare it to OFP or WW2OL

ninty · 10-19-2002, 10:19 PM

BF blows.

I bet more people thik it sucks more than they think its good.

I'll make a poll..

DJBUCKSHOT · 10-19-2002, 10:20 PM

Yes but thats because people who play Medal Of Honor know the truth.

Sicilian_Summers · 10-19-2002, 11:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ninty9

BF blows.

I bet more people thik it sucks more than they think its good.

I'll make a poll..

If that was the case, would MOHAA be behind bf1942 on the list of the most played games on the net?

ninty · 10-20-2002, 12:01 AM

MOH has been out for almost a year.

intrestedviewer · 10-20-2002, 01:40 AM

i think the game is badass, i love the ones where your in the citys, but the big huge outdoor maps, those just lower my fps to hell.

10-20-2002, 02:48 AM

More my cock is bigger than yours threads -

As RUDE said, these are two WAY different games. One more time...

MOH is more tight, man to man combat - BF is designed for large scale combat. Of course the game mechanics are going to be different. Or do you REALLY think wars were fought man to man - mano a mano.

The game is fine.

1080jibber · 10-20-2002, 02:56 AM

the game sucked*

i was all happy at first but the game laggs like a mofo on my comp. and i got an allright comp.

i tryed shuting off the sound but it still sucks, all choppy and sheit

piedude · 10-20-2002, 03:07 AM

Why complain about the maps being so big? I mean unlike MOHAA, you get to cruse about in Planes, Subs, Destroyers, tanks, half-trucks, jeeps etc etc as well as useing Anti-aircraft guns!

The maps need to be big to accommodate for them!

I think the game is awesome! Sure Spearhead will make MOHAA even better, BUT BF42 certainly aint a bad game!

cmelton · **Re: Another slanted opinion about BF 1942 -** 10-20-2002, 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TapDown

I am extremely disappointed with this game.
I figured this would be a good single player game but it reminds me of playing a single player match of QIII with Commodore Vic 28 graphics.
Not worth the money IMHO.
Perhaps the novelty lies with being able to operate different pieces of weaponry? I don't know if I'm missing something here but it sucks flying a plane when there are no instruments. Maybe they work with a different video setting? I dunno.............
Just thought I'd share. oOo:

it reminds you of quake 3 with comodore vic 28 graphics ? Im not sure that that is even possible. swordfight:

Webb · 10-20-2002, 08:56 AM

I don't like it.

Oldguy · 10-20-2002, 09:02 AM

I really like MOHAA, and I though 1942 would be more like it. I bought it a few weeks ago , played SP for about 4 hours , went back to MOH. freak: